 |
|
 |
 |
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now, so far I have talked about symbols that are associated with the Illuminati, and symbols that are often, but rightly should not be, associated with the Illuminati, and I have also talked about degree systems that should be considered rightly associated with the Illuminati, as well as degree systems that should be considered not rightly associated with the Illuminati.
In the next series of articles, I intend to address further symbols that can be associated with the Illuminati, but first let us finally finish with those symbols that are, but should not rightly be, associated with the Illuminati.
Firstly, here is a non-Illuminati symbol:
- source: http://www.benpadiah.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3848
This symbol combines the swastika inside the star of David motif of the modern Raelian UFO cut, following the Theosophical style of Blavatsky. Surrounding this is a coiled serpent, eating its own tail. Behind this is the Wewelsburg Castle "Black Sun" motif of the inner-SS, surrounded by the text of the most secret encrypted symbol of that Order. The Black Sun, the SS, and the Bohemian Grove, the Bilderberg group, the army-base Satanists, etc. are all the 7=OTO degree of the POD, and not the 6=IO degree of the POD. It is essential to establish the distinction between the "Illuminati" and the "NWO" group. Not even everyone in the OTO (begun as Yale's frat Skull and Bones) understands or even knows about the inspidi plans of the eugenicists.
However, this is all that I can muster for now, and I grow weary. I'll return to the bat-cave for now, but remember to tune in next page, same bat time, same bat channel. PEACE. - Jon _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now, insofar as we ahave established now what the "IO" is Not, that it is Not the OTO degree in itself, nor is it truly an appendent body of Masonry; we should begin to look at what the "IO" Is, and not only what it is Not. To this extent, we are left with few symbols by which to uniquely identify members of this group to one another through recognition, and thus to communicate the IO's "secrets" in this silent manner.
Foremost of all "true" IO symbols is the "eye in the triangle." This symbol did not appear prior to 1776, and was never used in any Masonic capacity. It is, indeed, the symbol of the "Illuminati" as a "pyramid scheme." It is printed on the money, because in theory finances work like voodoo: you tell two people, then they tell two people each, who tell two people each, etc. until eventually it "all adds up" and you "get rich quick." Of course, no one believes in such nonsense, and we all beleive instead in an "honest wage for an honest day's work." Because we disbelieve it, it fails to work, and not the other way around, in this case. The "pyramid scheme" idea is, in truth, so pervasive to our society that the "all seeing eye" of the Gov't is branded on every US dollar in circulation, now or ever.
"In the Land of the Blind, the One Eye'd Man is King."
Such is an "Illuminati Axiom," though the meaning now may be much different from what it would have meant at Weishaupt's time. A "king" now means the same thing as the idea of the "everyman," because the promise of US consumerism was that "everyman is a king." But there is only so much wealth to go around. Few kings lived richer than many middle-class yuppies ever can. And the poor will always be poor.
However, cleverly concealed in the symbolism of Illuminism is the meaning to those, the Illuminati, who would know how to unravel it. Thus, the "Light Within" is "Brought Out." Here we see that the eye-in-the-pyramid motif cleverly conceals the hidden truth: the eye is the apex of the truncated "body" or form of the pyramidon (a pyramid without a "cap-stone"). This symbolises the mind above the body below. Likewise, from this elevated vantage, the mind surveys the entirety of material reality, and thus, by "co-creating" its immediate surroundings, the mind manipulates matter using the body as an interface or relay station.
The second symbol of "True Illuminism" - which comes to us directly from Weishaupt and not from the, sensitively infiltrated, US Masons, prior to the split between the IO of Weishaupt into the non-Masonic 7 US degree system and the 4 degree system of Spain - is this actual layout of the "Pyramid" schema.
In the first iteration, one person "twins" their message to two people. By the time the original message has become distinct and been changed by the intermediary messengers enough that a third party can learn of it without knowing or meeting the one who began the concept then the person who originated the "meme" or message is called a "Master" in the Illuminati. Becoming a Master means going "three-deep."
However, there is going three steps or levels deep in society, and in a social way, and there is going three levels deep psychologically, for each individual, as well. The three steps of the "Pyramid" also symbolise three different roles played out by people in crowds. One is the "wanderers," one is the "civilisers," and one is the "conquerers," and each expands their own way outward from their initial, three-layered "Pyramidon." The wanderer explores aimlessly, sending out chutes like the branches of a tree. Contrarywise, the conqueror expands along a front founded on a controlled ratio, with only what is needed within and behind the lines. The civilisers are in between these, revealing a strange zodiac of different patterns, as all the members make choices within a given set of rules.
However, the Illuminati numerology is not confined to the Trinity and, as I will demonstrate, the Trinity is viewed as an ultimate evil by many Illuminati. The symbol of the "eye in the triangle" to an "Illuminatus" is a symbol of Ialdabaoth, the Demi-Urge, the devil or, simply put, Satan. As I will also demonstrate in coming articles, the numerology of the Illuminati includes 3, 5, 7, 13, and 23. These are specifically "Illuminati" numbers for a very specific reason. I shall explain more soon.
For now, though,
PEACE
- Jon _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Fri Jun 05, 2009 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It is possible that the three Blue Lodge degrees of Free Masonry were established as a contrary Trinity to that of the Catholic faith. It could, equally possibly, only be a coincidence. However, regardless of the original motives of the Masonic use of 3, the Catholic Church has since (and for a long time now) renounced Masonry and its concept of the Trinity. In Catholicism, the Trinity is a symbol of Unity: the three in one and one in three of the Father, son and Holy Ghost are, so to speak, three "faces" of one being, God. Since the Council of Nicea, these 3 have been considered inseperable, and their meanings one and the same for each. This runs contrary to the Masonic use of the Trinity, which establishes the 3 degrees of Blue Lodge Masonry as a progressive sequence that can operate for each member individually. One can become a 1st°, then stop, or progress to the 2nd° then stop, or progress to the 3rd° and stop. Beyond this are "appendent" bodies of Masonry revealing further Masonic mysteries in additional degrees, however the first 3° of Blue Lodge are integral to and the foundation for these other degrees as well.
It is most significant that the Catholic concept of the Trinity has long been expressed as a triangle. The Halo of God, whenever depicted in post-Rennaissance Christian art, has always been depicted as an equilateral triangle. The most striking examples of use of this motif occur in modern Eastern Orthodox churches, however the fact that it originated in the later European Dark Ages is relatively uncontested. It was never, as I have said, prior to 1776 associated with a pyramid however. The Trinue Halo of God as an equilateral triangle is specifically unique from the eye in the pyramid motif of Illuminism in several specific regards.
Here is an exmaple of the triune Halo motif, from Antoniazzo Romano, late 1400's.
Here is the first use in Christian art of the "eye of providence" or eye in the triangle
from Jacoppo Carucci (called Ponormo)'s Supper at Ammaus (1525):
In the former motif, we see the equilateral triangle used a symbol for the Trinity as the Halo of God. This depiction is that common in such other Christian motifs as Byzantine icons, Bulgarian churches, the Catholic church of St. Peter and in a work now found in the Metropolitan museum. In the latter depiction, we see the standard "eye of providence" (the so-called "all-seeing" eye), which was used to represent God in the independent tradition of Alchemy, interpolated within the triangular Halo design. The eye in the Pontormo painting is the right eye, the same eye used in ancient Egyptian symbolism of the eye of Ra or Horus. The eye of providence is also commonly used in Masonic symbolism, such as on the fold of the apron in some of the craft degrees. In Masonic use, both the right and left eyes are used interchangeably, and it does not appear to distinguish whether the meaning may be different between the right and left eye used in the Masonic symbols. The 1776 eye in the pyramid of Illuminism is a left eye. Because the Pontormo painting is the sole Christian depiction of the eye of providence within the triangular halo of God, and it is a right eye, and because no public Masonic works exists to dictate the specifically Masonic use of this symbol, it can be asserted that the "right-eye" is symbolic of the "eye of providence" within the triangular "halo of God" used in Christian art, while the "left-eye" is the symbolic "eye of God" within the pyramidon motif used by the Illuminati.
Now, aside from the obvious difference between the base-4 pyramid and the triangle, which I will discuss in greater detail in a moment, the most significance difference between the "IO" and the Catholic depictions of the "eye of providence" motif is the Illuminati interpretation of the Masonic Trinity which, as I have already said, is distinct from the Catholic Trinity in certain, remarkable ways. The Catholic Trinity is 3-in-1 and 1-in-3 (if you can believe that). The Masonic trinity are the three degrees of the Blue Lodge Craft degrees. Ordinarily these are depicted as three steps leading up to the basis or foundation for the York and Scottish rite degrees. These three stair-steps up to the "Lodge Door," figuratively speaking, are also depicted in the Illuminati eye in the pyramid design, although not in the pyramid itself. They are depicted in the iris of the eye of providence:
Thus, the pupil of the "eye of providence," surrounded by the 3 stair-steps in the iris, represents itself the "Lodge Door," and, more importantly, the "mir licht" promised beyond it to the hood-winked candidate. The iris of the Illuminati "eye of providence" is thus the Masonic Trinity, while the pupil itself represents the dilation of the eye to allow in the Light of Illumination. The difference between the Illuminati use of the "eye of providence" and that by Catholic and other Christian artists is that the 3-tiered iris of the Illuminati "eye" might be thought to signify the Masonic GAOTU rather than the Catholic Trinity. Putting the "eye of providence" of the GAOTU in the Trinune halo of God may be considered a blasphemy to Catholicism. This, I believe, was the intention: by infiltrating Masonry, Weishaupt hoped to militarize the order against Catholicism; as the Rosicrucian saying went, "the Pope is the Anti-Christ," and thus the GAOTU did not represent Lucifer, aside from insofar as a Good angel in opposite to the worse, "Satanic" power-monger, the Pope.
Also, before discussing the "pyramidon" motif distinguishing the Illuminati application of the Masonic version of the "eye of the GAOTU" to the Trinity halo motif of Catholicism, we should pause for a moment to consider the slogans commonly associated with the Illuminati "eye in the pyramid." Here we see the standard circular seal folded into a "vesica pisces," or yonic eye design:
above we see the slogan "ANNUIT COEPTIS," meaning, essentially, "fortune favours" from the old Greek saying "fortune favours the bold." However, rather than the "bold," the slogan continues with the lowered standard, emblazoned with the slogan "NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM," meaning, essentially, a "New Secular Order." This differs, also, from the Catholic concept of "Temporal Power," the psychic empire of the Church over her believers. Instead, the Illuminati slogan substitutes "Secular," generally interpreted as "worldly," for the "Temporal" or "Universal" power of the Church. Remember, the IO's prime directive was, at the start, to overthrow the governments of Europe (which answered to the Church) as well as the Church itself, and replace it with the Rosicrucian Roger Bacon's idea of a "New Atlantis." None of these words were chosen haphazardly; all are intended to be preserved for posterity. To this end, the date 1776, the date of the American Constitution's ratification, is emblazoned in Latin (Roman) numerals across the base of the pyramid: "MDCCLXXVI" meaning 1776, which was also the year, prior to the ratification of the Constituion, of the founding of the Bavarian Illuminati.
On this note, let us now begin to address the Pyramidon design itself. Although it is usually explained that the 13 steps of the Illuminati pyramid might represent the 13 original American colonies, the lowest step is actually the base, and so it's inclusion could be called into question, particularly because the design of the Illumianti pyramid pre-dated the adoption of the 13 stripes used on the original "Union Jack" of the US by, if only, a few months. The original "union jack" flag flown above the Continental Congress bore the symbol of a diamon-back rattle snake (the same used several years prior, chopped into 8 pieces to represent the divided colonies, which was captioned "Join or Die," indicating the severity of pre-Constitutional, colonial Unionism). The snake of 1776 was before 13 stripes, alternating red and white, and bored the caption "Don't Tread on Me," indicating the severity of the new Nation's Independent sovereignty. Here is the first flag, supposedly designed by Martha Washington, in 1777 showing the 13 stripes with 13 stars, which clearly represents the 13 colonies unified.
In point of fact, the 12 proper steps of the pyramid stand for something more significant to the Illuminati than even the 13 letters of "E PLURIBUS UNUM" ("out of one, many," explaining the pyramid scheme concept itself), and even more than the "unlucky" 13 of the Templar inquisition at the hands of the Catholic Church. The 12 steps of the pyramid, above the basis of foundation of the pyramid, can be further thought to stand for the stair-steps of the Masonic "Fellow-Craft" tracing board.
Here we see that, above the 3 lowest steps of the "winding stair" of the FC°, representing the 3 "Blue Lodge" degrees of Freemasonry, there are 12 steps on the stair case, divided into two sets, the first, of 5, representing the senses and the styles of columns, and the second, of 7, representing the schools of learning. The sequence of 3,5,7 will play into much of the Illuminati symbolism, because these numbers are the first odd numbers, and also the lowest prime numbers.
Most important of all is the sacred geoemtry used in the design of the Illuminati "eye in the pyramid" motif, because this, even moreso than any of the rest, speaks to its desire to appeal to the Masonic craft. Again, we find the sacred Trinity expressed, however here we see it expressed within the symbol itself as measurements of ratios, and not symbolically merely as the triangular shape itself. In this crudely rendered diagram, I have attempted to show some of these sacred ratios in the Illuminati pyramid design:
The blue line on the left signifies a measure of 1/3 the overall height from the base or foundation. The horizontal blue line across the middle signifies 2/3 of the overall width of the foundation, from the furthest left line to the furthest right line. This ratio can be moved around relative to how one interprets the base length, based on the fact that the motif itself is turned at a slight angle to express a second side of the pyramid as well. I express much more about these sacred ratios in this model on the page on my site: http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/dollahdollahbillsyall/GreatSeal.html In the last place in this diagram we come to the ratio of the cap-stone to the upper "platform" of the truncated "pyramidon," where the capstone is labeled as 2/3 the distance from its uppermost tip to the pyramidon's "platform" in the upper-right of the diagram.
Lastly, I want to address another Masonic monument, often mistaken for a statue of the "Whore of Babalon," Serapis or Semiramis. The Statue of Liberty is many things to many people. The torch she bears aloft has been a beacon for many wayward immigrants to the USA, however it cannot be disagreed, even among serious modern scholars, that this torch's original meaning was not as a beacon for the "tired, the poor and those yearning to breathe free," despite the Masonic ideals of Faith, Hope and Charity. Nor, however, is this a symbol of the "Babylonian Brotherhood." It is definately a massive ediface to honor the Masonic virtues, however the torch is one of "Illuminism" (radical, anti-papal anarchism) lighting the way to the "New Atlantean" Enlightenment, were secular humanism and the sciences have promised to replace the empire of Rome with a new world order. In lady liberty's hand is a tablet, upon which is written the date 1776, again in latin (Roman numerals) a a symbol to the Catholic Church of the new states' authority:
While the "Illuminati" symbolism (the Light Above) is perhaps even more obvious than all those aspects concealed in the Illuminati pyramid, the Masonic symbolism of the Statue of Liberty is somewhat more obtuse. Following is a depiction of the Statue as seen from almost directly above, with a red outline around the stellated base or foundation upon which the statue stands:
This symbol may not be immediately familiar to the average Freemason, and that is for a very good reason: it is not commonly known to most Masons, and is a symbol specifically reserved to only a handful of the highest initiates of the Scottish Rite. The symbol of the triple-triangle might still seem unfamiliar even to them, should they miss the subtraction of the basic square shape of the foundation from the middle. Here is the outline of the Masonic basis of the Statue of Liberty, clearly seen as an 11 pointed shape:
This shape may take a little bit of deciphering to unravel, however it is derived from attaching a regular square over top of the 3-triangle motif of the 33rd°. Here is the same outline, overlapped with this symbol:
The 4 points of the square addition remains indicated, somewhat, by the alignments of the handles and tips of the crossed sword and benediction-wand, however the other 6 points of the triple triangle design are more obvious, and inherent within the design of this symbol. The triple triangle motif, it should also be noted, should not be confused with the "heptagram" or 7 pointed star, which is also a symbol of the Illuminati that has slightly infiltrated the Masonic rites proper. It was adopted, however, directly by the OTO as the star of "BABALON," and this adoption threatens to reduce its original Illuminati meaning to Masonic geometry until it is merely accepted as an ineffable symbol, alike the Catholic Trinity itself.
PEACE.
- Jon _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now, why do I say:
| benpadiah wrote: |
| The Black Sun, the SS, and the Bohemian Grove, the Bilderberg group, the army-base Satanists, etc. are all the 7=OTO degree of the POD, and not the 6=IO degree of the POD. It is essential to establish the distinction between the "Illuminati" and the "NWO" group. Not even everyone in the OTO (begun as Yale's frat Skull and Bones) understands or even knows about the insipid plans of the eugenicists. |
- source: http://www.benpadiah.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=300506#300506
Without divulging much more than the minimum necessary about the cumbersome and elaborate workings of the POD's 5 "Bund" degrees, that attempt to unify all existing secret-societies into one, "umbrella" order, with its own agenda, degrees, etc. I will say simply this: The IO is distinct from the OTO. How, and why, exactly, would I need to make this distinction? The IO agenda was declared officially achieved around 1900, and the agenda of the top cult changed from that of world-conquest, to world-management, and more importantly, that was when the trend of rising numbers of new initiates within this top-most occult order, the OTO, began. These apcalyptic members of the OTO I refer to throughout most of my literature as the "neo-Sethians." Their agenda has infiltrated that of NWO "globalism" which was, during the 20th century, the primary push of the OTO's upper-most members.
But, before I get too far ahead of myself, allow me to lead you, my wayward FOOLS, through a brief history of 20th century occultism, following the last time the true IO would surface, prior to becoming a bifurcating and dead fractal pattern. In short, the IO was born in Germany, and it went back to Germany around 1900 to die. Consider the following wiki excerpts, with cited sources for more from each article:
Let's start with this brief description of the relationships between some of the founding members of the OTO (prior to Crowley):
| Quote: |
| The discussions between Reuss and Kellner did not lead to any positive results at the time, because Reuss was very busy with a revival of the Order of Illuminati along with his associate Leopold Engel (1858-1931) of Dresden. Kellner did not approve of the revived Illuminati Order or of Engel. According to Reuss, upon his final separation with Engel in June 1902, Kellner contacted him and the two agreed to proceed with the establishment of Ordo Templi Orientis by seeking authorizations to work the various rites of high-grade Masonry. Reuss and Kellner together prepared a brief manifesto for their Order in 1903, which was published the next year in The Oriflamme. Kellner died on June 7, 1905. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Kellner_(mystic)
Basically, what we are seeing here is the final "revival" of the IO, occuring between Theodore Reuss (German) and Leopold Engel (Irish). Now, the OTO would be founded later between Reuss and Kellner, but at this point, just prior to the formation of the OTO, these same two people are apparently at odds with one another of the "revived IO" of Reuss of Engel. Well, let's find out: "WHY"?
| Quote: |
Carl Kellner and Paschal Beverly Randolph were members. In Theodor Reuss' 1917 O.T.O. Constitution, it states in Article 1, Section 1:
Under the style and title: ANCIENT ORDER OF ORIENTAL TEMPLARS, an organization, formerly known as: "The Hermetic Brotherhood of Light", has been reorganized and reconstituted. This reconstituted association is an international organization, and is hereinafter referred to as the O.T.O.
|
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Brotherhood_of_Light
So, Reuss' and Engel's name for their revived IO was originally Frates Lucis, the "Brotherhood of Light," which had considered itself an operating body loyal to the "Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor," previously.
Just as an aside regarding the Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor, prior to the dissolution of its last working group in 1900, when that group was reformed into the OTO:
| Quote: |
The order's teachings drew heavily from the magico-sexual theories of Paschal Beverly Randolph, who influenced groups such as the Ordo Templi Orientis (O.T.O.) (later headed by Aleister Crowley) (Greenfield 1997) although it is not clear whether or not Randolph himself was actually a part of the Order.
Prior to the rise of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn in 1888 the HBoL was the only order that taught practical occultism in the Western Mystery Tradition. Among its members were a number of occultists, spiritualists, and Theosophists. Initial relations between the Order and the Theosophical Society were cordial, with most members of the order also prominent members of the T.S.
Later there was a falling out, as the Order was opposed to the eastern-based teachings of the later Blavatsky (Davidson considered that Blavatsky had fallen under the influence of "a greatly inferior Order, belonging to the Budhist [sic] Cult"). Conversely, the conviction in 1886 of the Secretary of the Order, Thomas Henry Burgoyne for fraud, was claimed by the Theosophists to show the immorality of the Order.
|
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Brotherhood_of_Luxor
Oh, I'm sorry, what's that you say? The rituals of the BoL were "magico-sexual" in nature, and this group split apart from more theoretical and mythological Theosophy as a more practical, ritual-based cult? Yes, and the last "lodge" of the BoL became the first Lodge of the OTO. So, what practises changed, and what stayed the same between the last lodge of the "revived IO" and the first lodge of the modern cult behind the NWO?
| Quote: |
Origins
The early history of O.T.O. is difficult to trace reliably. It originated in Germany or Austria between 1895 and 1906. Its apparent founder was Carl Kellner (probably with the German spelling Karl), a wealthy Austrian industrialist, in 1895 (although nothing verifiable is known of the Order until 1904).
Theodor Reuss (1855-1923) collaborated with Kellner in creating O.T.O., and succeeded him as head of O.T.O. after Kellner's death. Under Reuss, charters were given to occult brotherhoods in France, Denmark, Switzerland, the U.S.A. and Austria. There were nine degrees, of which the first six were Masonic.
In 1902, Reuss, along with Franz Hartmann and Henry Klein, purchased the right to perform the Rite of Memphis and Mizraim of Freemasonry, the authority of which was confirmed in 1904 and again in 1905. Although these rites are considered to be irregular, they, along with the Swedenborg Rite formed the core of the newly established Order.
|
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordo_Templi_Orientis#Origins
So, to recap, we have the last lodge of the IO and the first lodge of the OTO. They are one and the same. They changed some practises to quit being the IO and adopted some to become the OTO. Thus began the NWO, the New Age "Aeon" of "Aiwass," the "Equinox of the Gods," etc. We know the later IO was influenced by the "magico-sexual" theories of Beverly Randolph, who was also a founding member of the OTO. However, now, we also see that this group of occultists definitively quit being an IO operating body that was only "influenced" by magico-sexual concepts, and took up being a specifically operating body that practised the "Rites of Memphis and Mizraim." So, just what are these "rites of memphis and mizraim"? Wikipedia has this to say:
| Quote: |
From as early as 1738, one can find traces of this Rite filled with alchemical, occult and Egyptian references, with a structure of 90 degrees. Joseph Balsamo, called Cagliostro, a key character of his time, gave the Rite the impulse necessary for its development. Very close to the Grand Master of the Order of the Knights of Malta, Manuel Pinto de Fonseca. Cagliostro founded the Rite of High Egyptian Masonry in 1784. Between 1767 and 1775 he received the Arcana Arcanorum, which are three very high hermetic degrees, from Sir Knight Luigi d’Aquino, the brother of the national Grand Master of Neapolitan Masonry. In 1788, he introduced them into the Rite of Misraïm and gave a patent to this Rite.
It developed quickly in Milan, Genoa and Naples. In 1803, it was introduced by Joseph, Michel and Marc Bedaridde. During this period of time, the Rite recruited not only aristocrats but Bonapartists and Republicans, and sometimes even revolutionary Carbonari.
It was forbidden in 1817, following the incident of the Four Sergeants of La Rochelle and the uneasiness caused by the Carbonari. Lodges became meeting-places for opponents to the regime, which led to the decline of the Rite, and around 1890, the last Masons of the Rite regrouped in the only remaining Lodge: Arc-en-Ciel. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rite_of_Memphis-Misraim
WOW. So, first of all, the RoM&M form a link between Napolean-sympathising Knights of Malta in France and the Italian Carbonari (the "black hand" who assassinated Arch-Duke Ferdinand of Austria and began WWI). That in itself is amazing. Both of these are deeply politically motivated organisations; both are precursors to such round-table think tanks as the CFR or the Soviet Duma. The Knights of Malta claim both Catholic sanction for their charter, and direct descent of lineage from the church-purged Knights Templar. The Carbonari were post-Marx, pre-Marxism, global anarchists. I won't bother linking to more on these groups, as I discuss both at length already on this forum, here:
http://www.benpadiah.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=438
(NEXUS004 : macrocon :: the cult of sleep and the order of death)
So, obviously we see the RoM&M became "unpopular" once it became associated with the Carbonari, Italian anarchists. Let's pause briefly over the "Four Sergeants Affair" that ultimately doomed the RoM&M until it's "revival" in the form of the OTO, a few generations later.
| Quote: |
The Four Sergeants of La Rochelle (Boris, Goubin, Pommier and Raoulx) were guillotined in Paris in 1822. Their great courage initiated a liberal campaign and they became legendary.
They became particularly popular figures amongst the carbonari in Italy. The flag used by the Four Sergeants was once owned by Prince Jérôme Bonaparte. It is a French Tricolor bearing the slogans Constitution and Napoleon II on one side and Honour and Fatherland on the other.
The flag was used by the carbonari ventes between 1821 and 1822. It was seen during the plot of the 29th line regiment in Belfort, then in Paris, and finally in La Rochelle where it was preserved. It passed through the hands of the Lieutenant-Colonel Caron, then to M. Dubourjal, then to Marquis d'Audan who finally offered it to Prince Napoleon in 1888.
|
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Sergeants_of_La_Rochelle
So, the "Four Sergeants Affair" basically describes the equivalent for this pre-NAZI movement (to, in this case, restore an empire guised as a republic) of their own version of the NAZI "blutfahne" (blood flag). The idealogy of both organisations was the same: create political dischord as a means of rapidly achieving political power. The slogan of the "Four Sergeants" Blood-Flag was "Honor" and "Fatherland." In short, patriotic nationalism, the same agenda of the NAZIs.
Now, we've looked at the brief history of the RoM&M, seeing that they tie together some very important and influential figures of world history immediately prior to the beginnig of WWI, in which the Carbonari themselves were specifically culpable. If you need to look the conspiracy for global domination in the face during the years 1800 - 1900, you need only look toward the RoM&M. But before we can look at just what the RoM&M is, we have to also consider the Rites of Swedenborg, the other primary component of the original degree system of the pre-Crowley OTO.
| Quote: |
The Swedenborg Rite or Rite of Swedenborg was a fraternal order modeled on Freemasonry and based upon the teachings of Emanuel Swedenborg. It comprised six Degrees: Apprentice, Fellow Craft, Master Neophyte, Illuminated Theosophite, Blue Brother, and Red Brother.
It was created in Avignon in 1773 by the Marquis de Thorn. It was initially a political organization, whose aims were to bring freemasonry into disrepute, although the political ideology was eventually discarded from the rite. This version of the Swedenborg Rite died out within a decade of its founding.
Starting in the 1870s, the Rite was resurected as a hermetic organization. This version faded out sometime around 1908. The Rite is now extinct, but influenced the development of other groups such as Ordo Templi Orientis.
|
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedenborg_Rite
So, the Swedenborg rite originated among an economic elite, but as a means of defaming and discrediting Free Masonry. If this is the case, then why would the OTO choose to adopt it's structure and tenants, unless it meant to slander Masonry? However, if this was the case, then why did the OTO seek Masonic charter (granted Oriental) to practise the RoM&M? Well, the whole lynchpin of the argument stems down to what the RoM&M really are.
For an example of the flowery depiction of their order by the modern practitioners of the RoM&M, consider this list of names of past Grand Masters, and descritions of various lodges active when, all over the world, which can be found on scribd:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13157994/A-Complete-History-of-the-Ancient-and-Primitive-Right
Now, that is what the OTO has to say about itself. Now contrast that to this excerpt from Francis King, a highly reliable scholar on early 20th century occult groups, from his book: the "Secret Inner Order Rituals of the OTO."
| Quote: |
I
Take a suitable woman willing to aid thee in this Work. Explain to her fully the precautions to be taken and the manner of life necessary. Let her horoscope be, if possible, suited to the nature of the homunculus proposed; as, to have an incarnate Spirit of Benevolence let Jupiter be rising in Pisces with good aspects of Sol, Venus, and Luna; and with no notable contrary dispositions; or so far as may be possible.
II
Take now a man suitable; if convenient, thyself or some other Brother Initiate of the Gnosis; and so far as may be, let his horoscope also harmonize with the nature of the work.
III
Let the man and woman copulate continuously (but especially at times astrologically favourable to thy working) and that in a ceremonial manner in a prepared temple, whose particular arrangement and decoration is also suitable to thy work. And let them will ardently and constantly the success of thy work denying all other desires. Thus proceed until impregnation results. |
- source: http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/elib/magick/OTO.pdf
(pg. 187 of the 247 long pdf. doc.,
under the section heading: "OF THE HOMUNCULUS : A Secret Instruction of the Ninth Degree")
This is the ninth degree "knowledge lecture" of the original OTO, to which Crowley joined in 1910, and which he took over in 1912. You won't find this same knowledge lecture in any of the modern publications circulated within the OTO as OTO-based material. However, this is the basis for the OTO. Compare the ritual of the "Homunculus" to Crowley's 1917 novel "Moon Child":
| Quote: |
In this work, numerous acquaintances of Crowley appear as thinly disguised fictional characters. Crowley portrays MacGregor Mathers as the primary villain, including him as a character named SRMD, using the abbreviation of Mathers' magical name. Arthur Edward Waite appears as a villain named Arthwaite, and the unseen head of the Inner Circle of which SRMD was a member, "A.B." is theosophist Annie Besant. Among Crowley's friends and allies Allen Bennett appears as Mahatera Phang, Isadora Duncan appears as Lavinia King,and Mary D'Este as Lisa la Giuffria. Cyril Grey is Crowley himself, while Simon Iff is either an idealized version of an older and wiser Crowley or his friend Allen Bennett.
A year or so before the beginning of World War I, a young woman named Lisa la Giuffria is seduced by a white magician, Cyril Grey, and persuaded into helping him in a magical battle with a black magician and his black lodge. Grey is attempting to raise the level of his force by impregnating the girl with the soul of an ethereal being — the moonchild. To achieve this, she will have to be kept in a secluded environment, and many preparatory magical rituals will be carried out. The black magician Douglas is bent on destroying Grey’s plan. However, Grey's ultimate motives may not be what they appear. The moonchild rituals are carried out in southern Italy, but the occult organizations are based in Paris and England. At the end of the book, the war breaks out, and the white magicians support the Allies, while the black magicians support the Central Powers. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonchild_(novel)
Sounds like nonsense? Well, after Crowley took over the OTO from it's last surviving founding member, he changed the degree structure to reflect the ten degrees used (or rather, to Crowley, implied) by the Golden Dawn's degree structure. He kept the "essental (magico-sexual) characteristics" of the 90° RoM&M, and apparently greatly diminished the more "Masonic" Swedenborg Rite connextions. However, by no means did the RoM&M practise of sex-magick end when Crowley re-ordered the degree system of the OTO. The group-focus remains, to this day, on sexual-magick. Consider that one generation after Crowley, Jack Parsons (head of NASA's solid rocket-fuel dept. the JPL) and L. Ron Hubbard (founder of Scientology) were devout OTO members, who performed a magical-sexual ritual called the "Babalon Working" to, again, create a Moon-child or Homonculus.
| Quote: |
The Babalon Working was a series of magic ceremonies or rituals commenced on March 2, 1946 by Jack Parsons, essentially designed to manifest an individual incarnation of the archetypal divine feminine called Babalon, as well as to catalyze the reification of that force as it exists latently in every man and woman. During the ceremony L. Ron Hubbard acted as a scribe noting the results of the magickal workings. When Parsons declared that the first of the series of rituals was complete and successful, he almost immediately met Marjorie Cameron in his own home, and regarded her as the creation of the ritual, considered her his "Scarlet Woman", and soon began the next stage of the series--an attempt to conceive a child through sexual magick workings. Although no child was conceived, this did not affect the result of the ritual to that point. Parsons and Cameron soon married.
The rituals performed drew largely upon the Enochian magical system devised by Dr. John Dee and Sir Edward Kelley. They also drew heavily from rituals and sex magick described by Aleister Crowley, who in turn borrowed many aspects of his Babalon from combining the Babylonian goddess Ishtar with the figure of Mystery Babylon, the "Great Whore" in the biblical Book of Revelation.
A brief text entitled The Book of Babalon, or Liber 49, was written by Jack Parsons as a transmission from the goddess or force called Babalon received by him during the Babalon Working. Parsons said that Liber 49 constituted a fourth chapter of Liber AL Vel Legis (The Book of the Law), the holy text of Thelema.
In the gematria of Hermetic Qabalah, Aleister Crowley equated the number 156 with Babalon (equating the letter 'o' with the Hebrew letter Ayin which has the value 70). In Enochian, "Babalon" means "wicked". "Babalond" means "a harlot". |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babalon_Working
Here you can read Parson's own account of the "Babalon Working." Parson's name within the OTO was "Anti-Christ."
- resource: http://www.sacred-texts.com/oto/lib49.htm
Following the Babalon working in the later 40's, the CoS and ToS have both formed as imitations following Parson's degredation of Crowley's monicker, "To Mega Therion" (the "great beast") to it's lowest form, representing the "goat of Mendes." Crowley himself would have laughed at the association of the gematria of his magickal monicker being associated with the 666 of Revelations now, some three and a half generations later, but most D&D RPG playing "Wiccans" and "Pagans" (in name only) as well as the followers of Tim LaHey's rabidly Christian "Left Behind" series both consider "Crowley was a Satanist" to be the end-all be-all of the discussion about him. Most OTO members, I regret to report, have never even read Crowley's autobiography, "the Confessions."
No, sadly, most of the modern pactitioners of the OTO's occult agenda remain the economically elite, the wealthy globalists, and the rabid, patriotic nationalists of yesterday, who have, one generation later, expanded into the global imperialists of today. Bohemian Grove is a fine example of an OTO "camp."
And they are on the "conservative" side. On the more "liberal" side are out-right "neo-Sethian" believers in causing global destruction in an "end of the world" style Apocalypse. And the plans to prepare for this contingency: global destruction, were laid out prior to the 1940's, when construction began on the eariest examples of "deep underground military installations" by NAZIs in Antarctica, in an area that is called to this day, "New Swabia."
Even during the later life of Crowley himself, we find those who were then in the OTO and practising the "magico-sexual" RoM&M were those who were plotting to take over the world. The Illuminati agenda was declared dead when the OTO was formed because the IO agenda was to conquer the world, and the OTO agenda has been to rule the world, from behind closed doors, using "magical" paper money. Wthin the OTO now, the neo-Sethian movement wants to blow us all up. But until the neo-Sethian movement establishes it's own specific degree system, a heirarchy of rituals, etc. it is only a "movement" and not an "Order" in itself.
So, who are the neo-Sethians? Well, look at the trend following Parsons, Cameron and Hubbard. In 1955, Karl Germer, Crowley's second-in-command in the OTO, and one of its original founders, expelled Kenneth Grant from the OTO. Crowley's opinon of Grant was that he was "too dark" and too obsessed in his pursuit of what magicians of the time called the "left hand path" (meaning, essentially, the "magico-sexual" concepts). Grant was an ardent Theosophist, and Crowley wasn't. Crowley was a practical magician and to this day Grant remains a mere secretary of rumours and opinons with no basis in factual reality.
Grant's primary vein of research has been the 32 "Kalas." According to Grant, as well as his disciple Michael Beartieux (author of the totally Theosophical, absolute rubbish, stream of consciousness, "Voudoun Gnostic Workbook"), the Orishas of Vodoo are based on petro, blood-letting rites. He borrows the pre-Hindu Vedic term "Kala" (meaning phase or span of time) to describe what he identifies as 32 different types of human blood and bodily fluids. Men, according to Grant's own "research" have 16 Kalas, and women have 16 Kalas. Grant advocates drinking menstrual blood from women of various ages and stages of development, citing Crowley's use of the term "Star-Fire" to describe the "Elixer Vitae" or pure water of everlasting life contained within the Holy Grail.
Crowley's meaning for the term "Star-Fire" can be debated, but Grant's "dangerous obsession" with the "magico-sexual" Dark-side, or "left-hand path," cannot be denied. His protege, Austin Osman, who died the year after Grant was expelled from the OTO by Germer, was an "automatic artist" and "stream of consciousness" author, who had little or no skill or training in practical magick, and it seems as though Grant's attempt to exhorcise the "Typhonian" trend of neo-Sethianism from the OTO in some advanced form of reverse seance may have proved successful: the Typhonian OTO has no rigid, or even defined, degree system or hierarchy of order, and so it remains an independent tradition, alongside that of neo-Sethianism, among members within the OTO. The "Typhonian OTO" has nothing to do with the neo-Sethian agenda of bringing about the "Apocalypse" planned by the Bohemian Grove OTO camp members. It seems the goal of the "Typhonian OTO" was more to simply clear Crowley's name from it's "Satanic" associations by CoS and ToS members of the post-Crowley OTO. It is this trend that constitues neo-Sethianism. Thus, if the "Typhonian OTO" formed a degree system, it could become either a threat or an ally to the neo-Sethian movement, however for now they remain two, unrelated and unequal, movements within, and among members of, the OTO.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordo_Templi_Orientis_(Typhonian)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Grant
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Spare
None of this is to say the academic writings of Kenneth Grant, using vague "Orientalist" Theosophy and syncretism of QBLH with vooodoo to advocate literal blood-drinking ceremonies, are not legitimate works, describing factual practises. It is simply that he is describing it, while it is mainly the other members of the OTO than those who follow Grant that are the ones who are, currently, actually practising the ingestion of menstruum, the breeding of "moon-children" and the "magico-sexual" RoM&M. Those are the rich elite at Bohemian Grove, who are third and fourth generation members of the highest degrees of the OTO. The OTO is the religion of the NWO.
In this sense, it is different from the "Illuminati" or the agenda of the original IO, or Weishaupt's Bavarian "Perfectibilists," however one wishes to call them. The IO, even if associated with the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, an inflammatory defmmation of Hassidic QBLHism, which can be dated to no earlier than that time, the primary goals of the Illuminati, as well as the first 22 of the 24 Protocols, had been achieved by 1900, and thus this was when the last IO became the first OTO.
The change that was made from the former IO lodge to the latter OTO lodge was simple: the IO of Weishaupt was designed to be "quasi-Masonic." It was designed around the initiative of infiltrating and subsuming the lodges of Free Masonry using the manner of infiltration developed under Hassan Ibn Sabba of the Crusades-era Persian Assassin cult. Thus, the concept of Illuminism's "exoteric" or "outer" shell fell between the later Rosicrucian-era dictates of "the Pope is the anti-Christ" made by Familist-cults and the earlier, Jacobin-era dictates of "Fraterntiy or death" made by the earliest Scottish Rite Lodges in France and America. Illuminism was a revolutionary concept, that occured at specifically the right moment in history for it to have occured. The notion of taking over the world was more acceptable to people, at least, professors in Germany in the late 1700's, if it was dressed in the rosey-coloured, Familist notions of a "no laws necessary" utopia to follow. The same ideas expressed by Weishaupt as meant for the rich elite were much later championed by Karl Marx as a viable strategy for a workers' Revolution. However, by the time Marx's ideas could be implimented, such a revolution was staged by the early OTO, the founding-members of the Yale camp of "Skull and Bones." The Rockefellers funded Lenin's Bolshevik revolution, and fueled his Soviet imperialism during the US depression and rise of NAZI Germany. However, by that time, the former "IO, now the "OTO" or "Order of Death" or of "the death's head," under Crowley, controlled the economic and political aspects of society in not just those three main countries, but also the entire civilised world. This is when the OTO began, around 1900, with Crowley's dictation of "Liber Legis." The IO ended, and the OTO began. The world is conquered, time to manage it.
A small group of OTO members, who have consolidated the most economic power on the earth, are of the pro-Apocalypse belief. I call them "neo-Sethians."
PEACE.
- Jon _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we here in this IO branch, the IOBB2, of the US wing of the Bavarian Perfectibilists, ie. the predecessors on US soil of the OTO precursor, the German Skull and Bones, should all consider these words with great care, and should come to a decision for themselves about this information.
How does the OTO seem to relate to the IOBB2 and the "modern" IO? Constantly, Alex Jones and other "conspiracy theorists" (in name only) spout the latest news assuring us the Bilderberger take-over of US soveriegnty is going smoothly, despite all our best efforts. But what does he call the Bilderbergers? He calls them, the "Illuminati." Is this fair, or is this a slander? Alex Jonesd has been to Bohemian Grove and filmed the ceremony there. He has also witnessed what many others report, though he remains strangely silent about: the bizarre sexual rituals performed there. According to, of all people, Hank Azaria (the voice of Homer Simpson on tv's cartoon show by Matt Greonig), there is a "seperate island" for "where they keep the women." "Weaving Spiders Come Not Here." Alex Jones: Enemy of the NWO.
In any event, there should be some gut feeling for any member of the "Randian" US "IO" (as replicated here on IOBB2) about what I have just said in regards to the IO and its relationship to the OTO. You should all examine that "gut feeling" and analyse it, determine if it is "right" or "wrong" inteligently, "Objectively," and then act relative to your descision.
I have personal experience with a few OTO members myself. When I was 18, in 1997, I petitioned to join the OTO online via the "submit membership petition via email" feature of the "oto-usa.org" site. I discovered you had to pay for more than an "adjunct" membership, so I opted to recieve the newsletter and not pay regular dues, remaining in the "zero degree." At the end of my "trial period" I petitioned again for reguar dues membership to the OTO grand lodge via their website. I exchanged emails with the head of initiations at that time, "Ixel Balamke" (a "pen-name" or pseudonym). I inquired, before I joined, if my membership in the OTO would in any way effect on my eligibility for membership in Free Masonry if I wanted to later become a Free Mason. She wrote back saying no, there was no "affiliation." I wrote back pointing out, "but the founders of the OTO were masons," to which she replied, tersely, "it's DO WHAT THOU WHILT SHALL BE THE WHOLE OF the LAW." (I had mis-quoted in a previous email the OTO greerting and said, the "Whole of Thy Law.") This pretty much ended the exchange, and she refered me to the closest local lodge-head. This camp, located in Jaxonville, Flordia, was closer than the next nearest one, in Lousiana, which was only slightly closer to me than the one in Augusta, Georgia. I spoke via emails briefly with him, and he offered to send a member who lived nearby to come and drive me there (to Tampa) to be "initiated" by ceremony. I told him this wasn't something I was really prepared to do at that time, and that ended our correspondence.
Later, I discovered, via canadian masonry dot com, a chapter of the IO operating in my hometown. I enthusastically signed up for the group, hoping to be able to meet the local members and undergo initiation. I joined the internet forum for the site, hoping to find someone online who might have access to translations of some of Weishaupt's own actual writings. I, as we all did, soon enough discovered the Tallahassee-based "IO" was nothing but the online "IOBB," there were no initiation rituals or ceremonies, only a e-mail course, and the whole thing was a mis-managed sham. It was when I first joined the IOBB that I met Nilsson Aime, an older forum-member of the IOBB1. Although he'd never posted on the "hidden" forums for each level, IXO Didymus (his nom deplume) was already a 7th level "IO Master" by the time he became my "mentor" in the IOBB1 e-mail scam. Later, after I'd quit the IOBB1, IXO confided in me something he'd made known to many other members of the IOBB1 before: he was a member of the OTO.
Almost immediately afterwards our personal relationship began to deteriorate. He tricked me into making long-distance phone-calls at weekday prices by telling me they would be free "conference calls" he'd booked for us online. Soon afterwards, despite my mentioning that to him, he went on to stipulate I refer to him only as "Master" and his screen name. I thought that was more than a little bit weird. So I called him out in a chat we were having with some fellow (by then also defunct) IOBB1 7th Master-level members. The first time, another of those present through an ego-fit and logged off. A second time, a fellow old IOBB1 poster came to IXO's defense, but was then, himself, falsely accused of a crime. A third time I called him out, in a long document I sent as an email to everyone who'd been involved thus far. He contacted me repeatedly afterwards, demanding I do him the same favour the admins of the IOBB1 had done for me: delete his posts on the IOBB2. So far I have gleefully re-posted every email he has sent in which he begs for this priveledge. I have not heard back again from him recently.
Personally I have a distrust for the OTO. During my first attempt to confront IXO about IXO's problem with IXO's grandiose "IXO-persona's" ego, when the other person there stood up at random against me, Nilsson said something that caught my ear: "I guess Jon doesn't come from a happy family." I didn't take it too personally, considering that "happy family" is code.
No, I dont like the OTO-members that I've met, personally. This may very well provide a personal bias for why I have said what I just said, in the way that I just wrote it. The IO is not only NOT the same, anymore, as the OTO, but the IO can, conceivably, be used a method of leverage or counter-weight against the inexorable gravitas of the OTO's sexual deviancy as practised by the economic elite. This was, I suppose, to some large extent my hope early on in developing the POD as a method of delivery for the "Atlantean Democracy" message. The POD was an outgrowth of the "reformed IO," the sister-project of the IOBB2. The IOBB2 only chronicled the posts made on the original IOBB1, whereas the later "reformed IO" was an attempt to correct the mis-applied concepts of the IO itself, and thus "restore" the IO. This "experiment in occultism" split between my own POD project, and IXO Didymus' OTO-based "IOK&M." The "egregore" of the IOK&M is a horned owl. It's degree system is only revealed upon taking a death-oath to Nilsson himself, and might not even actually exist. The POD is, simply put, the opposite, point by point, of the IOK&M.
It is my belief that the "degree system" of the IO, shown to us on the IOBB1, reproduced here on IOBB2 for posterity, was itself merely an OTO ruse, circulated to various initiates of other esoteric schools and mystery traditions as an "Illuminati" document, when really it was all only an OTO experiment, and had nothing whatsoever to do with Weishaupt's original "Illuminati" or Perfectibilists. But I digress...
To those who know, no belief is necessary. For those who know not, no belief will suffice.
PEACE.
- Jon _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| benpadiah wrote: |
| And yes, we all know full well about the practise of Satanism. |
- source: http://www.benpadiah.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=297531#297531
As Nixon used to say, "Now More Than Ever," we understand how the practises of the 10, 11 and 12 degrees of the OTO, involving masturbation, progenation and sodomite sex-magic, have led directly to the CIA "internal-project" the Finders, responsible for trafficking in women and children as expendable sex-slaves for the financial elite. We have now seen, and none of us can now deny knowing, how the IO died when the OTO was born. Crowley emphasised the RoM&M, and de-emphasised the quasi-Masonic Swedenborg Rites. With this, the mission-statement of the IO was subtly declared accomplished, and the mission-statement of the OTO subtly replaced it as the guiding principle for the occult elite. The IO's mission to "conquer the world" was achieved. The OTO's mission to "govern the world" is now the accepted mission of the occult elite.
We have seen how the OTO was born. Let us look more at just how and WHY the IO finally "died," and was replaced by the Thule Order of the Death's Head. The part of the IO that was lost when the inner-Order's agenda was usurped by the OTO was replaced by sex-magic. What was this previous method of the IO that was discarded and that defines the difference between, essentially, "revolution" and "dictatorship"? The entirety of the IO's curriculum at the time of the formation of the OTO that was discarded was included in the Cipher Manuscripts of the Golden Dawn.
| Quote: |
The Cipher Manuscripts are a collection of 60 folios containing the structural outline of a series of magical initiation rituals corresponding to the spiritual elements of Earth, Air, Water and Fire. The "occult" materials in the Manuscripts are a compendium of the classical magical theory and symbolism known in the Western world up until the middle of the 19th century, combined to create an encompassing model of the Western Mystery Tradition, and arranged into a syllabus of a graded course of instruction in magical symbolism. It was used as the structure for the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. The basic structure of the rituals and the names of the Grades are similar to those of the Rosicrucian orders Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia and the German 'Orden der Gold- und Rosenkreuzer'.
The folios are drawn in black ink on cotton paper watermarked 1809. The text is plain English written from right to left in a simple substitution cryptogram known as the Trithemius cipher, attributed to Johannes Trithemius, a medieval German abbot. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher_Manuscripts
So, we see the impact the Cipher Manuscripts themselves had on the occult world of the day. They constituted the curriculum of the Golden Dawn that was formed by Mathers and to which Crowley belonged prior to his joining the OTO. The folios describe the rituals outlined in the outer-order, Argentum Astrum, and the inner-order, the Gold and Rose Cross, or simply the Golden Dawn proper. Before we continue to consider the history of the cipher manuscripts themselves, however, we should first delve back to the earliest possible date for their composition in the form in which they were discovered. They were written, as found, in the "cipher method of Trithemius," and so we can look no longer ago than to him for their origin in their current form. Trithemius was a 15th century abbot who lived in Germany.
| Quote: |
He studied at the University of Heidelberg. Travelling from university to his home town in 1482, he was surprised by a snowstorm and took refuge in the Benedictine abbey of Sponheim near the Bad Kreuznach. He decided to stay and was elected abbot in 1483, at the age of twenty-one. He set out to transform the abbey from a poor, undisciplined and ruinous place into a centre of learning. In his time, the abbey library increased from around fifty items to more than two thousand. However, his efforts did not meet with praise, and his reputation as a magician did not further his acceptance. Increasing differences with the convent led to his resignation in 1506, when he decided to take up the offer of the Bishop of Würzburg, Lorenz von Bibra (bishop from 1495 to 1519), to become the abbot of St. James's Abbey, Würzburg, the Schottenklöster in Würzburg. Among his pupils were Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa (1486-1535) and Paracelsus (1493-1541).
Trithemius' most famous work is Steganographia (written c.1499; published Frankfurt, 1606, placed on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum in 1609). This book is in three volumes, and appears to be about magic - specifically, about using spirits to communicate over long distances. Since the publication of the decryption key to the first two volumes in 1606, they have been known to be actually concerned with cryptography and steganography. Until recently, the third volume was widely still believed to be about magic, but the "magical" formulae have now been shown to be covertexts for yet more cryptography content. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trithemius
Trithermius, the 15th century abbot of Germany, not only taught both Agrippa and Parcelsus, but developed a complex poly-alphabetic cipher mechanism. Just what, then, is the Trithemius cipher. Some knowledge in cryptography is recommended to understand some of the terms in the following excerpted quote from wiki.
| Quote: |
The Trithemius cipher is a polyalphabetic cipher invented by the German author and monk Johannes Trithemius in the fifteenth century. The cipher was published in his book Polygraphia, which is credited with being the first published work on cryptology. It uses a letter square with the 26 letters of the alphabet following 26 rows of additional letters, each shifted once to the left. This creates 26 different Caesar ciphers. This method removes the letter frequencies from the ciphertext, making it appear as a random string or block of data. However, if a person is aware that this method is being used, it becomes easy to break. The cipher is vulnerable to attack because it lacks a key, which is said to break Kerckhoffs' principle, a rule of cryptology.
Using a tabula recta, each alphabet is shifted one letter to the left from the one above it. This forms 26 rows of shifted alphabets, ending with Z (as shown in image). Data is encrypted by switching each letter of the message with the letter directly below, using the first shifted alphabet. The next letter is switched by using the second shifted alphabet, and this continues until you have encrypted the entire message. In 1553, an important extension to Trithemius's method was developed by Giovan Battista Bellaso called the Vigenère cipher. Bellaso added a key to switch cipher alphabets every letter. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trithemius_cipher
The actual, most complete and last modified version of the Trithemius cipher is the "tabula recta," or "magic-letter square." It should appear obvious to any serious occultist the similarity between the Tabula Recta and the 7 Kamea, as well as the infernal squares of Abramelin.
| Quote: |
In cryptography, the tabula recta is a square table of alphabets, each row of which is made by shifting the previous one to the left. The term was invented by Johannes Trithemius in 1518, and used in his cipher.
Trithemius used the tabula recta to define a polyalphabetic cipher which was equivalent to Leon Battista Alberti's cipher disk except that the alphabets are not mixed. The tabula recta is often referred to in discussing pre-computer ciphers, including the Vigenère cipher and Blaise de Vigenère's less well-known (but much stronger) autokey cipher. All polyalphabetic ciphers based on Caesar ciphers can be described in terms of the tabula recta.
In order to encrypt a plaintext, one locates the row with the first letter to be encrypted, and the column with the first letter of the key. The letter where the line and column cross is the ciphertext letter. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabula_recta
The primary significance of the Tabula Recta, however, was that it was the biggest breakthrough in cryptography since the "Alberti Cipher-Disk," which had probably been in use long before the life of the person for whom it is now named.
| Quote: |
The Alberti cipher disk, also called formula, is a cipher disc which was described by Leon Battista Alberti in his treatise De Cifris of 1467. The device embodies the first example of polyalphabetic substitution with mixed alphabets and variable period, and is made up of two concentric disks, attached by a common pin, which can rotate one with respect to the other.
The larger one is called Stabilis [stationary or fixed], the smaller one is called Mobilis [movable]. The circumference of each disk is divided into 24 equal cells. The outer ring contains one uppercase alphabet for plaintext and the inner ring has a lowercase mixed alphabet for ciphertext.
The outer ring also includes the numbers 1 to 4 for the superencipherment of a codebook containing 336 phrases with assigned numerical values. This is a very effective method of concealing the code-numbers, since their equivalents cannot be distinguished from the other garbled letters.
The sliding of the alphabets is controlled by key letters included in the body of the cryptogram.
The Alberti disk encipherment has nothing to do with Affine Shifts, Keyword shifts, Caesar shift or Vigenère ciphers. Caesar’s cipher is a simple substitution based on the sliding of a single ordinary alphabet with fixed key. Once the equivalent of a letter is discovered all the equivalent cipher letters are known. With the Alberti cipher there are two mixed alphabets and the key varies continuously during encryption, therefore the discovery of a single letter does not permit further progress. Frequency analysis is also impossible because the same letter is always enciphered differently. The Vigenère cipher is based on a single ordinary alphabet like that of Caesar and is easily solved after discovering its fixed period by means of the Kasiski exam. This is not possible with Alberti. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberti_cipher_disk
Now, the Alberti Cipher-disk might be a harder code to crack, but it was the later, and much more complex, Trithemius Cipher in which we find the Golden Dawn Cipher Manuscripts were written. To understand who wrote the cipher-manuscripts, and WHY they wrote them, we have to re-examine some of the history surrounding the founding of the Golden Dawn, based on the rituals described in the folio.
| Quote: |
William Wynn Westcott, a London Deputy Coroner, member of the S.R.I.A. and one of the founders of the Golden Dawn, claimed to have received the manuscripts through Rev. A. F. A. Woodford, who was a colleague of noted Masonic scholar Kenneth R. H. Mackenzie. The papers were to have been secured by Westcott after Mackenzie’s death in 1886, among the belongings of Mackenzie’s mentor, the late Frederick Hockley, and by September 1887, they were decoded by Westcott.
The Manuscripts also contained an address of an aged adept named Fräulein (Miss) Anna Sprengel in Germany, to whom Westcott wrote inquiring about the contents of the papers. Miss Sprengel responded, and after accepting the requests of Westcott and his partner and fellow Mason Samuel Liddell MacGregor Mathers, who had helped translate the texts, issued them a Charter to operate a Lodge of the Order in England. Westcott's first Golden Dawn temple was the Isis-Urania Temple, styled "No. 3." Temple No. 1 would have been Fräulein Sprengel's lodge, and No. 2 was supposedly an abortive attempt at a lodge by some unnamed persons in London (possibly a reference to Mackenzie and other S.R.I.A. members some years earlier).
The Manuscript itself has true antiquarian origins, traceable to Johann Falk and passed through the hands of Francis Barrett, Eliphas Levi, and eventually to Mackenzie, Woodford and the S.R.I.A. (and the Society of Eight). There really was a German Rosicrucian order, sometimes referred to as the "Gold und Rosenkreutz," and it already had a branch in London, founded around 1810. Mackenzie was a member of this German order, into which he had been initiated by Count Apponyi of Hungary, and obtained the rituals described in the Cipher from them. The first Golden Dawn temple was a project of a secret group within the S.R.I.A. called the "Society of Eight". The Cipher Manuscript was legitimate, and the Golden Dawn is a valid offspring of an older Jewish order in Bavaria called Loge zur aufgehenden Morgenröthe, or "Lodge of the Approaching Morning Light." Using the Cipher Manuscripts, Mackenzie allegedly founded "The Society of Eight" as the first phase of what was to later become the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. Thus Mackenzie's group was Temple No. 1, and Frederick Hockley, also alleged to be a member of "The Society of Eight", founded Temple No. 2. When Isis-Urania was founded, it was numbered as No. 3. |
- source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher_Manuscripts
Now, more than ever, we can recognise the "Brotherhood of Luxor" as the same "Society of Eight" that was the "inner-order" within the SRIA prior to the founding of the Golden dawn. They manipulated key members of the SRIA into founding the GD as a means of finalising and completing the IO's phase as the chief guiding modus within the occult elite. The BoL were, as we have already seen, magico-sexual in their practises. They infiltrated the SRIA, posing as the "Society of 8," and planted the GD rituals. The result of the GD was, as we have already seen, the death of the IO and the birth of the OTO.
PEACE!
- Jon
ps. my own online resource for the GD cipher manuscripts can be found here:
http://www.hermetic.com/gdlibrary/cipher/
and my pdf e-book edition based on this resource can be found here:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/7869584/the-Cipher-Manuscripts-of-the-Golden-Dawn _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 8:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| Much of the hierarchical structure for the Golden dawn came from the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia, which was itself derived from the Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Order_of_the_Golden_Dawn#Structure_and_Grades
As we shall see in a moment, though there was a definite inspiration from these prior Orders' degree systems for the co-members of both who founded the GD, we cannot claim the degree system of the GD is exactly identical to that of the SRIA nor the Order of the G&RC. In point of fact, the GD restored to these their originally intended, and thus most proper, order.
First, however, let us look at the history of these prior, Rosicrucian societies and Orders that supposedly inspired the degree system of the GD.
| Quote: |
| The Order of the Golden and Rosy Cross (Orden des Gold- und Rosenkreutz, also the Fraternity of the Golden and Rosy Cross) was a German Rosicrucian organization founded in the 1750s by Freemason and alchemist Hermann Fichtuld. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_Golden_and_Rosy_Cross
That this is an "Order" implies that its members held ranks according to the chivalric code degree-system used by royalist Knights to this day. Thus, we can postulate that this Order would comprise the earlier, elder and thus "higher" or "supernal" order to the later "Society" of the same affiliations. However, bear in mind that the "Rosicrucians" had been around prior to this Order since the early 1600's, when the fama, confessio and chemycal wedding were originally published. Because of this, we can speculate that this "Order" was formed to mark the conclusion of the Rosicrucian movment in much the same way as the modern OTO marked the accomplishment of the goals of the Illuminati.
| Quote: |
| Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (Rosicrucian Society of England) is a Masonic esoteric Christian order formed by Robert Wentworth Little and Kenneth Mackenzie in 1865 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societas_Rosicruciana_in_Anglia
Following from this, we can thus see how the "Society" model of latter-day Rosicrucians reflects the "Scottish Rite" concept, following the chivalric "Order" of the G&RC, which in turn reflects the earlier "York Rite" of appendent to the Blue Lodge degrees. Just as the York Rite precedes the Scottish Rite, and is considered equivalent to the "chivalric" degress of Scottish Rite, so too does the chivalric "Order" of the G&RC act as the superior predecessor of the "Society" of the same, which in turn is alike the Scottish Rite's inferior "philosophical" degrees, appendent between the Blue Lodge and chivalric degrees. In short, as the Above (either chivalric York rite Masonry or the Order of the G&RC) is elder, so Below (either philosophical Scottish rite Masonry or the SRIA) is younger. This formula is key to comprehending the method of descent and abolition of governmental structures, as such are applied in the occult degree systems used during such times. Just as the Order of Rosicrucians gave way to the SRIA, so too did the BOL give way to the OTO. Such is the perpetual cycle.
Now, to return to the exact structures of the crypto-Rosicrucian / Illuminati-era degree systems that inspired that of the GD. I mentioned they differed between the Order, the Society and the GD versions. The difference is in the number of their schools, and the number of degrees or grades within each of these schools. The Order of the G&RC, as incorporated into Scottish rite Masonry as the "philosophical" degrees, and the SRIA, incorporated into York rite Masonry as chivalric ranks, have different numbers of degrees than their culmination cult, the GD, equivalent for the Rosicrucian movement to the beginning of the Illuminati-era.
While the SRIA / G&RC degree system has 9 degrees in 4 schools, the GD has an additional supernal degree, equivalent to the single chief governor of the entire Order's administration. This is how all liberal-Democratic movements are gradually converted into conservative-Republican movements, oposed to their inevitable conversion into imperialist-Dictatorships. Here is the degree system of the SRIA:
| Quote: |
1st Order
Grade I - Zelator
Grade II - Theoricus
Grade III - Practicus
Grade IV - Philosophus
2nd Order
Grade V - Adeptus Minor
Grade VI - Adeptus Major
Grade VII - Adeptus Exemptus
3rd Order
Grade VIII - Magister
Grade IX - Magus
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societas_Rosicruciana_in_Anglia#Structure_and_Governance
And here is the degree system of the GD, as expressed in this diagram by Crowley:
Here is the same degree system listed, as opposed to diagramed according to the contemporary "Tree of Life" diagram of ha QBLH:
| Quote: |
First Order
Introduction—Neophyte 0=0
Zelator 1=10
Theoricus 2=9
Practicus 3=8
Philosophus 4=7
Second Order (R.R. et A.C.)
Intermediate—Portal Grade
Adeptus Minor 5=6
Adeptus Major 6=5
Adeptus Exemptus 7=4
Third Order
Magister Templi 8=3
Magus 9=2
Ipsissimus 10=1
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_Order_of_the_Golden_Dawn#Structure_and_Grades
By adding the degree of "Ipsissimus" to the crypto-Rosicrucian's degree system, the "neo-Sethians" or psychic-conspirators within the Order of Death's bund of schools completed the collonialisation of the liberal-Democratic Rosicrucian movement. The liberal-Democratic "Order" became the conservative-Republican "Society," and this became the imperialist-Dictatorship of the GD. The first "Ipsissimus" or dictator of the GD administraton over the crypto-Rosicrucian movement was Aleister Crowley, whom, as we have already mentioned, was also put in charge of re-structuring the OTO degree-system (from the 90° RoM&M) to reflect that of the GD.
In the same way the Illuminati Order (as the BoL) became the OTO (based on the GD), the GD itself was only the resolution of the Rosicrucian movement, bringing the Rosicrucian degree system up-to-date with the origins of the IO. The GD's degree system was similar to the SRIA, but addended a single, dictator-degree. Likewise, the OTO took the IO's originally 11 grade degree system and compressed the 90° of RoM&M into it using the GD's 10° system.
There remains, always, an "inner-Order" and an "outer-Order," not only within Orders as schools of grades or degrees, but between Orders of the Bund as well. The "inner-Order" of Rosicrucians used the GD degree system from 1600 on, but only made their original cipher-manuscripts public after the end of the subsequent IO-era. The "inner-Order" of the IO practised anarcho sex-magick from 1776 until 1900, when they became known instead as the OTO. The "inner-Order" of the OTO are now (2010) the richest and most militarily powerful elite the world has ever known. Just as John Dee was the first "inner-head of the Order" of the G&RC, so too was Aleister Crowley the first "outer-head of the Order" of the OTO. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
benpadiah AHDVNHAY

Joined: 09 Oct 2004 Posts: 2411 Location: phi^2/pi=e
|
Posted: Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Next, let us turn our focus for attention away from the "occultism" of 20th century sects of speculative philosophers toward modern economic and political planning bodies, yet continue in this to apply the same method for studying both: to analyse their degree systems. So we shall see how the earlier idealogies of these occult sects has infused and inspired the politics and economics of the 20th century.
The rapid assumption of political and economic rank by crypto-IO / neo-OTO operatives and occult initiates was due to the first world war. As more people became aware of the propagation of European cults in England and America - the GD being the most public, but no less so was the Theosophical Society than was Weishaupt's original IO in the form of Skull and Bones - there became an increased presumption of a trans-Atlantic "cult-gap," which Crowley, an Englishman, traveled to America to counter-balance (presenting the OTO works of Reuss to the Northern jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite in 1919). This was the era when the initiate as shamen idea was usurped and suppressed by the idea of the initiate as a spy.
To begin our analysis, let us take up the storyline in 1917, the year of the Bolshevik Revolution of October 25 (Julian) or November 7 (Gregorian). By this time, many of the European, middle-eastern and Asian nations were in ruins from WWI. The Treaty of Versailes began being negotiated (1919) long before the end of combat operations was officially declared (1922). It was already being drafted by political planning committees staffed by the wealthiest bankers in 1917. This planning body was called, at the time, "The Inquiry."
| Quote: |
The Inquiry was a study group established in 1917 by Woodrow Wilson to prepare materials for the peace negotiations following World War I. The group, composed of around 150 academics, was directed by presidential adviser Edward House and supervised directly by philosopher Sidney Mezes. The group worked from the premises of the American Geographical Society of New York.
Mezes's senior colleagues were geographer Isaiah Bowman, journalist Walter Lippmann, historian James Shotwell, and lawyer David Hunter Miller. Others included James Truslow Adams.
Members of the inquiry, now named American Commission to Negotiate Peace, traveled to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, accompanying Wilson aboard the USS George Washington to France.
The members would later form the Council on Foreign Relations. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Inquiry
Now, before we can begin to discuss the CFR, we must briefly also view the transitionary era during the drafting of the Treaty of Versailles, which also created the League of Nations (precursor to the modern UN), on June 28, 1919. Thus, even if the "Inquiry" group's intentions were benign diplomacy, it appears that by the time their boat reached French shores, they were hell-bent on ruling the world. We see the original membership of the "Inquiry" group (academics, philosophers, philanthropists, geographers, journalists, historians, lawyers, etc.) was quickly replaced by far more pro-war / hawkish interests once they arrived to represent the US and President Woodrow Wilson's "14 point plan."
| Quote: |
The American Commission to Negotiate Peace, successor to the Inquiry, participated in the peace negotiations at the Treaty of Versailles, January 18 — December 9, 1919. Frank Lyon Polk headed the commission in 1919. The peace conference was superseded by the Council of Ambassadors, 1920–1931, which was organized to deal with various political questions regarding the implementation of provisions of the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I. Members of the commission appointed by President Woodrow Wilson included:
Clive Day, an American college professor and writer on economics history at the University of California.
Donald Paige Frary, an American college professor with Yale University, an expert on International Affairs, and author; served as a secretary to Edward M. House.
Edward M. House, a diplomat, politician and presidential foreign policy advisor to President Wilson.
Vance C. McCormick, an American politician and prominent businessman from Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Sidney Edward Mezes, an American philosopher and college professor, former president of the City College of New York.
Charles Seymour, an American college professor at Yale University. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Commission_to_Negotiate_Peace
As we see now, the pro-war / hawkish globalists' perspective superceded the originally more diplomatic mission as it was intended by President Wilson. By this point, Wilson himself had become disenchanted with the political processes at the negotiations over the Treaty of Versailles, and left the conference in February, 1919, to return to the US, placing Colonel House in his seat on the round-table "Council of Ten." Although they had been long-time friends, House betrayed Wilson's soft-hearted stance on reperations from Germany and imposed, instead, the heavy-handed sanctions on them that bankrupted the German economy and led to the rise of the Third Reich and the fommenting of a second world war. The resultant Treaty was so odious to Wilson's own original vision that the final wording was never pased into ratification by the US Senate. The US never officially joined the League of Nations that US President Woodrow Wilson had idealised in his "14 points." Instead, the plotting of globalist politicial interests took the economical route to achieving its ends in the USA. Here we shall see the first meeting of the CFR was held during the negotiations on the Treaty of Versailles.
| Quote: |
The earliest origin of the Council stemmed from a working fellowship of about 150 scholars, called "The Inquiry", tasked to brief President Woodrow Wilson about options for the postwar world when Germany was defeated. Through 1917–1918, this academic band, including Wilson's closest adviser and long-time friend "Colonel" Edward M. House, as well as Walter Lippmann, gathered at 155th Street and Broadway at the Harold Pratt House in New York City, to assemble the strategy for the postwar world. The team produced more than 2,000 documents detailing and analyzing the political, economic, and social facts globally that would be helpful for Wilson in the peace talks. Their reports formed the basis for the Fourteen Points, which outlined Wilson's strategy for peace after war's end.
These scholars then traveled to the Paris Peace Conference, 1919 that would end the war; it was at one of the meetings of a small group of British and American diplomats and scholars, on May 30, 1919, at the Hotel Majestic, that both the Council and its British counterpart, the Chatham House in London, were born.
Some of the participants at that meeting, apart from Edward House, were Paul Warburg, Herbert Hoover, Harold Temperley, Lionel Curtis, Lord Eustace Percy, Christian Herter, and American academic historians James Thomson Shotwell of Columbia University, Archibald Cary Coolidge of Harvard, and Charles Seymour of Yale. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_foreign_relations#Early_history
All of the original members of this group were wealthy banking magnates and industrial sector monopolists. They may have seen their aims as "humanitarian" at the time, but their goal was no less than to reshape all existing society as they, themselves, saw fit. Thus, we come back full circle to the morals and dogma of the crypto-IO / neo-OTO under Aleister Crowley. Crowley's restructuring of the OTO's 90° RoM&M system into accordance with the 10°'s of the Golden Dawn system came at the cost of Crowley implanting throughout all his literature for the OTO his own unique concepts, such as the "Law of Thelema" ("Do What Thou Wilt"). As we have studied the "Typhonian" OTO of Kenneth Grant and Austin Spare, as well as the CoS of LaVey and the ToS of Acquino, we can quickly see Crowley's impact on the "Left Hand Path" devotees of the RoM&M, the practitioners of "sex-magick." Likewise, Crowley's own inner-most ring of disciples included JPL / NASA rocket-scientist Jack Parsons and pre-Dianetics / Scientology L. Ron Hubbard. So, what did the CFR's first meeting of 12 at the Majestic Hotel in Paris during the signing of the Treaty of Versailles beget in its wake by around the time of the Parsons / Hubbard "Babalon Working" (March 2, 1946)?
| Quote: |
The original composition was six civilians (mostly scientists), and six high-ranking military officers, two from each major military service. Three (Souers, Vandenberg, and Hillenkoetter) had been the first three heads of central intelligence. The Moore/Shandera documents did not make clear who was the director of MJ-12, or if there was any organizational hierarchy.
The named members of MJ-12 were:
Rear Adm. Roscoe H. Hillenkoetter: first CIA director
Dr. Vannevar Bush: chaired wartime Office of Scientific Research and Development and predecessor National Defense Research Committee; set up and chaired postwar Joint Research and Development Board (JRDB) and then the Research and Development Board (RDB); chaired NACA; President of Carnegie Institute, Washington D.C.
James Forrestal: Secretary of the Navy; first Secretary of Defense (replaced after his death on MJ-12 by Gen. Walter Bedell Smith, 2nd CIA director)
Gen. Nathan Twining: headed Air Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson AFB; Air Force Chief of Staff (1953–1957); Chairman of Joint Chiefs of Staff (1957–1961)
Gen. Hoyt Vandenberg: Directed Central Intelligence Group (1946–1947); Air Force Chief of Staff (1948–1953)
Gen. Robert M. Montague: Guided missile expert; 1947 commander of Fort
Bliss; headed nuclear Armed Forces Special Weapons Center, Sandia Base
Dr. Jerome Hunsaker: Aeronautical engineer, MIT; chaired NACA after Bush
Rear Adm. Sidney Souers: first director of Central Intelligence Group, first executive secretary of National Security Council (NSC)
Gordon Gray: Secretary of the Army; intelligence and national security expert; CIA psychological strategy board (1951–1953); Chairman of NSC 5412 Committee (1954–1958); National Security Advisor (1958–1961)
Dr. Donald Menzel: Astronomer, Harvard; cryptologist during war; security consultant to CIA and NSA
Dr. Detlev Bronk: Medical physicist; aviation physiologist; chair, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council; president Johns Hopkins & Rockefeller University
Dr. Lloyd Berkner: Physicist; radio expert; executive secretary of Bush's JRDB
According to other sources and MJ-12 papers to emerge later, famous scientists like Robert Oppenheimer, Albert Einstein, Karl Compton, Edward Teller, John von Neumann, and Wernher von Braun were also allegedly involved with MJ-12. (see also Arguments for below, particularly statements by Dr. Robert Sarbacher) |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12#Membership
By the end of the second world war, it was already considered no longer feasible to apply a diplomatic approach toward global government. The military "doomsday" backup-plan was put into effect. This was when Dwight D. "Ike" Esienhower warned of the threat of the growing "military-industrial complex." This is when "black-ops" and "black-budget" spending on them became vogue. Naturally we do not have these shadow agencies under cover of umbrella corporations, protected from the "ell seeing eye" under the "wings of the eagle," so to speak, anymore. Now, we have the DHS "fiasco" attempting to fix an intelligence community that was already functional, only being paid to look the other way on 9-11. This has effectively allowed many of the "black-ops" to become "rainbow-ops" or those performed in or on the public. So, what then, was and is this "military-industrial" complex Ike warned us of? What is the interim like between the implimentation of the "military-industrial" complex and the DHS shake-down of all "good cops" following 9-11-2001? During the last century, from 1910 until 2010, the Federal Reserve Central Bank of the USA has held complete economic authority over the "military-industrial" complex's "black-budgets" for their "black-op" wars and "black-bag" torture at "black-sites." The Federal Reserve Bank is the "front" business covering the money held by the CFR (public-relations) portion of the Trilateral Commission (the "military-industrial" complex itself). The Bilderberg Group under the Federal Reserve, the Fed under the CFR, the CFR under the Trilateral Commision, and the Trilateral Commission under the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), and so on and so forth. The whole political "chess-game" as envisioned by Zbiegnew Brzenski is purchased with credit on loan and paid for by the "Federal Reserve," a privately owned bank with a no-bid sole-rights deal with the Constitutional US Republic. Here is the degree system used within the cult of the Federal Rserve:
| Quote: |
The Federal Reserve describes its structure as composed of five parts:
· The presidentially appointed Board of Governors (or Federal Reserve Board), an independent federal government agency located in Washington, D.C.
· The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), composed of the seven members of the Federal Reserve Board and five of the twelve Federal Reserve Bank presidents, which oversees open market operations, the principal tool of U.S. monetary policy.
· Twelve regional privately-owned Federal Reserve Banks located in major cities throughout the nation, which divide the nation into twelve Federal Reserve districts. The Federal Reserve Banks act as fiscal agents for the U.S. Treasury, and each has its own nine-member board of directors.
· Numerous other private U.S. member banks, which own required amounts of non-transferable stock in their regional Federal Reserve Banks.
· Various advisory councils. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_reserve_bank
So we can now see how the modern Federal Reserve Bank, which controls the flow of paper money from the minting press, is alike a latter-day, crypto-Crowleyian version of the GD / OTO's degree system, without philosophical justification, nor any seeming need for such from philosophers. The degree systems used by occult sects are undeniably obvious, and though that of the Fed is the same in general structure to these, the Fed remains a secret shrouded in a riddle wrapt up within an enigma. Even today, dilligent efforts by congressmen like Ron Paul attempting to make public the full accounting books of the Fed are relentlessly blocked and slaughtered by a predominantly Zionist congress. And who, when we look at the bottom-line, was behind the creation of the Fed, the CFR, the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations (precursor to the UN)? Here is a list of their names:
| Quote: |
A particularly severe panic in 1907 provided the motivation for renewed demands for banking and currency reform. The following year Congress enacted the Aldrich-Vreeland Act which provided for an emergency currency and established the National Monetary Commission to study banking and currency reform.
The chief of the bipartisan National Monetary Commission was financial expert and Senate Republican leader Nelson Aldrich. Aldrich set up two commissions — one to study the American monetary system in depth and the other, headed by Aldrich himself, to study the European central-banking systems and report on them. Aldrich went to Europe opposed to centralized banking, but after viewing Germany's banking system, he came away believing that a centralized bank was better than the government-issued bond system that he had previously supported. Centralized banking was met with much opposition from politicians, who were suspicious of a central bank and who charged that Aldrich was biased due to his close ties to wealthy bankers such as J.P. Morgan and his daughter's marriage to John D. Rockefeller, Jr. In 1910, Aldrich and executives representing the banks of J.P. Morgan, Rockefeller, and Kuhn, Loeb & Co., secluded themselves for 10 days at Jekyll Island, Georgia. The executives included Frank A. Vanderlip, president of the National City Bank of New York, associated with the Rockefellers; Henry Davison, senior partner of J.P. Morgan Company; Charles D. Norton, president of the First National Bank of New York; and Col. Edward House, who would later become President Woodrow Wilson's closest adviser and founder of the Council on Foreign Relations. There, Paul Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co. directed the proceedings and wrote the primary features of what would be called the Aldrich Plan. Warburg would later write that "The matter of a uniform discount rate (interest rate) was discussed and settled at Jekyll Island." |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Federal_Reserve_System#The_National_Monetary_Commission
Nelson Aldrich was their primary political champion at the time of the passage, on December 23, 1913, as ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251 of 12 U.S.C. ch.3, the "Federal Reserve Act." The final wording of the Act itself was taken from the "Aldrich Plan," proposing a National Reserve Association with 15 regional district branches and 46 geographically dispersed directors. This differed from the final wording in the numbers of those who served at each level, but this three-tiered plan remained in place throughout the legislative history of the Fed Act, ever since its inception at the meeting on Jekyll Island between Aldrich and the wealthy industrialists and bankers of his time. These wealthy industrialists and bankers were all WWI profiteers, who had no-bid government contracts supplying the military with weapons, vehicles, gas, etc. As such, they continued meeting, such as the May 19, 1919 meeting to create the CFR held at the Majestic Hotel, and continued founding further "round-table" think-tanks, called by then "Trusts" - such as those of the Carnegie Ford scholarship foundation or the International Endowment for the Arts.
These planning-bodies, so-called "round-table" type think-tanks, are the modern inheritors of competition between elder sectarians and occultists over various degree systems. The modern Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, does not, it is safe to assume, know anything about "magick" ala Crowley, nor "majic" ala UFOs. All he knows about is economics, and how to speak the language used by those who have the most money. However, whether he knows it or not, Ben Bernanke is standing on the shoulders of Aleister Crowley as much as Nelson Aldrich. Of course, Crowley alone cannot be credited with the invention of the degree-system's use itself. However without Crowley, there could have been no Fed, just as without Weishaupt no Crowley, and likewise, without Dee, no Weishaupt.
So, having covered the history from Dee's original Rosicrucian movement, through the IO-era and into the modern OTO's NWO paradigms, let us return again to the symbolisms unique to only the IO. Now that we know the history before and after the IO, let us resume our study of IO symbols with this information in mind.
PEACE. - Jon _________________
 |
|
| Back to top » |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|